Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (4):556–571 (2003)

Authors
Simon Cushing
University of Michigan - Flint
Abstract
Article responds to the criticism of speciesism that it is somehow less immoral than other -isms by showing that this is a mistake resting on an inadequate taxonomy of the various -isms. Criticizes argument by Bonnie Steinbock that preference to your own species is not immoral by comparison with racism of comparable level
Keywords speciesism  Peter Singer  preference  Bonnie Steinbock  agentism  personhood  moral agency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9833.00201
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

All Animals Are Equal.Peter Singer - 1989 - In Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Oxford University Press. pp. 215--226.
Speciesism and the Idea of Equality.Bonnie Steinbock - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (204):247 - 256.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Speciesism and Speciescentrism.Frauke Albersmeier - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (2):511-527.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Speciesism Opposed to Liberationism?Tzachi Zamir - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):465-475.
Ferré: Organicistic Connectedness—But Still Speciesistic.Arthur Zucker - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):185 - 190.
What is Speciesism?Oscar Horta - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):243-266.
Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Humanism: An Introduction.Jim Herrick - 2003 - Prometheus Books.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
2,496 ( #1,139 of 2,432,321 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
135 ( #4,489 of 2,432,321 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes