Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):51 – 58 (1979)
A theory purporting to solve the problem of universals must be able to explain predication, recurrence, and classification. How Platonism does this is well known. Here I take a hard look at an attempt by M.J. Cresswell to give an Aristotelian answer and show it to be a complete and utter failure. The answer does not eliminate commitment to universals and it is only half an answer anyway because it does not cover relational predicates, an omission that Russell noted dooms answers by other philosophers as well.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What is Aristotle's Theory of Universals?M. J. Cresswell - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):238 – 247.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kelsen Et la Probleme Des Universelles: Kelsen and the Problem of Universals.Eric Engle - manuscript
Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals Vol. II.David M. Armstrong - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Platonism and the Invention of the Problem of Universals.Lloyd Gerson - 2004 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):233-256.
Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and Its Problems.Riin Sirkel - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
The Problem of Universals and Wyclif's Alleged "Ultrarealism".Paul Vincent Spade - 2005 - Vivarium 43 (1):111-123.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #213,129 of 2,178,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,497 of 2,178,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?