Simon Cushing
University of Michigan - Flint
Rawls's theory of political obligation attempts to avoid the obvious flaws of a Lockean consent model. Rawls rejects a requirement of consent for two reasons: First, the consent requirement of Locke’s theory was intended to ensure that the liberty and equality of the contractors was respected, but this end is better achieved by the principles chosen in the original position, which order the basic structure of a society into which citizens are born. Second, "basing our political ties upon a principle of obligation would complicate the assurance problem." Instead, Rawls offers a duty-based account, whereby we are duty-bound to support and comply with just institutions that apply to us. A. John Simmons argues that Rawls cannot meet the particularity requirement of establishing political obligation to only one state. I assess the response that this requirement can be met by the political constructivist element of Rawls's theory. I conclude that there are fatal flaws in this response
Keywords Rawls  Political Obligation  Particularity requirement  A. John Simmons  Samuel Freeman  Locke  Assurance Problem  Duty of justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Problems of Population.Jan Narveson - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):62-86.
Presumptive Benefit, Fairness, and Political Obligation.George Klosko - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):241-259.
The Anarchist Position: A Reply to Klosko and Senor.A. John Simmons - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):269-279.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Citizenship and Obligation.Pavlos Eleftheriadis - forthcoming - In Julie Dickson & Pavlos Eleftheriadis (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
Compliance with Just Institutions.Zoltan Miklosi - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):183-207.
Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap.Jiafeng Zhu - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy (4):1-23.
What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory.Dorota Mokrosińska - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
Civility as Political Constraint.William A. Edmundson - 2002 - Res Publica 8 (3):217-229.
Recognized Rights as Devices of Public Reason.Gerald Gaus - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):111-136.
Political Obligations.George Klosko (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
1,143 ( #5,012 of 2,499,685 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #10,059 of 2,499,685 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes