Post-Holocaust Jewish Aniconism and the Theological Significance of Barnett Newman’s Stations of the Cross

Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 26 (1):118-147 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


_ Source: _Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 118 - 147 This paper challenges the widespread emphasis on the absence of God in post- Holocaust historiography, theology, and art by suggesting that Barnett Newman’s _Stations of the Cross_ may have been conceived under the theological category of the apophatic rather than the aesthetic category of the sublime. This paper focuses on the “anti-realist” position of Newman and other artists for whom the Holocaust necessitated a renewed aniconic tendency in Jewish aesthetics. His work, I suggest, holds out a tension between absolute absence and redemptive presence that at once resists and affirms a negative aesthetic of God’s solidarity with suffering.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Panofsky-Newman Controversy.Pietro Conte - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (2):87-97.
Barnett Newman and Heideggerian Philosophy.Claude Cernuschi - 2012 - Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.


Added to PP

26 (#449,520)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reframing postmodernisms.Mark C. Taylor - 1992 - In Philippa Berry & Andrew Wernick (eds.), Shadow of Spirit: Postmodernism and Religion. Routledge. pp. 11--29.

Add more references