Analysis 77 (2):278-287 (2017)

Authors
Brian Cutter
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
The consequence argument is widely regarded as the most important argument for incompatibilism. In this paper, I argue that, although the consequence argument may be sound in its standard formulations, it does not support any thesis that could reasonably be called ‘incompatibilism’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anx052
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay on Free Will.Peter Van Inwagen - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Are We Free to Break the Laws?David Lewis - 1981 - Theoria 47 (3):113-21.
An Essay on Free Will.Michael Slote - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (6):327-330.
Against Counterfactual Miracles.Cian Dorr - 2016 - Philosophical Review 125 (2):241-286.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Laws of Nature and Free Will.Pedro Merlussi - 2017 - Dissertation, Durham University
What the Consequence Argument Is an Argument For.Justin A. Capes - 2019 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):50-56.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

So-Far Incompatibilism and the so-Far Consequence Argument.Stephen Hetherington - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):163-178.
The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta.Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-184.
Against Libertarianism.Alicia Finch - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (3):475-493.
Lehrer and the Consequence Argument.Danilo Šuster - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (1):77-86.
The Supervenience Argument.Jason Turner - 2004 - Florida Philosophical Review 4 (1):12-24.
Incompatibilism and the Past.Andrew M. Bailey - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):351-376.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Naturalism.Jason Turner - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):565-587.
Van Inwagen’s Consequence Argument.Michael Huemer - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
Molinists (Still) Cannot Endorse the Consequence Argument.Yishai Cohen - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (3):231-246.
The Core of the Consequence Argument.Alex Blum - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (4):423-429.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-12

Total views
92 ( #112,585 of 2,433,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #52,021 of 2,433,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes