Moving Beyond ‘Therapy’ and ‘Enhancement’ in the Ethics of Gene Editing

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (4):695-707 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

:Since the advent of recombinant DNA technology, expectations about the potential for altering genes and controlling our biology at the fundamental level have been sky high. These expectations have gone largely unfulfilled. But though the dream of being able to control our biology is still far off, gene editing research has made enormous strides toward potential clinical use. This paper argues that when it comes to determining permissible uses of gene editing in one important medical context—germline intervention in reproductive medicine—issues about enhancement and eugenics are, for the foreseeable future, a red herring. Current translational goals for gene editing research involve a different kind of editing than would be required to achieve manipulation of complex traits such as intelligence, and there are more pressing questions that need attention if clinical use of gene editing in reproductive medicine ever becomes a possibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public views on gene editing and its uses.Hub Zwart, George Gaskell & Imre Bard - 2017 - Nature Biotechnology 35 (11):121-123.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Nurturing or Purifying the Human Genome: Promises and Pitfalls of CRISPR Germline Editing.Evelyne Shuster - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):299-304.
Who Goes First? Deaf People and CRISPR Germline Editing.Carol Padden & Jacqueline Humphries - 2020 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 63 (1):54-65.
Cutting Eugenics Out of CRISPR-Cas9.Carolyn Brokowski, Marya Pollack & Robert Pollack - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):263-279.
The Medical Case for Gene Editing.Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (1-2):57-66.
Germline Gene Editing: The Gender Issues.Iñigo de Miguel Beriain, Ekain Payán Ellacuria & Begoña Sanz - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (2):186-192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-18

Downloads
52 (#454,303)

6 months
2 (#1,356,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryan Cwik
Portland State University

References found in this work

Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
Human genetic enhancements: A transhumanist perspective.Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (4):493-506.
Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.Nicholas Agar - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):9-19.
Can Enhancement Be Distinguished from Prevention in Genetic Medicine?Eric T. Juengst - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (2):125-142.

View all 9 references / Add more references