Criminal Justice Ethics 20 (1):25-27 (2001)

Authors
Cynthia A. Stark
University of Utah
Abstract
This paper discusses the views of Wheeler and LaFollette on the right to bear arms. It argues, with LaFollette and against Wheeler that the right to bear arms is derivative and not a fundamental right. My argument pivots on the idea that Wheeler's account of what makes a right fundamental is too broad.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0731129X.2001.9992096
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Gun Control.Hugh LaFollette - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2):263-281.
Gun Violence and Fundamental Rights.Samuel C. Wheeler - 2001 - Criminal Justice Ethics 20 (1):19-24.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
69 ( #153,637 of 2,444,966 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #311,040 of 2,444,966 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes