Medical Ethics in Qiṣāṣ (Eye-for-an-Eye) Punishment: An Islamic View; an Examination of Acid Throwing
Journal of Religion and Health 55 (4):1426–1432 (2016)
AbstractPhysicians in Islamic countries might be requested to participate in the Islamic legal code of qiṣāṣ, in which the victim or family has the right to an eye-for-an-eye retaliation. Qiṣāṣ is only used as a punishment in the case of murder or intentional physical injury. In situations such as throwing acid, the national legal system of some Islamic countries asks for assistance from physicians, because the punishment should be identical to the crime. The perpetrator could not be punished without a physician’s participation, because there is no way to guarantee that the sentence would be carried out without inflicting more injury than the initial victim had suffered. By examining two cases of acid throwing, this paper discusses issues related to physicians’ participation in qiṣāṣ from the perspective of medical ethics and Islamic Shari’a law. From the standpoint of medical ethics, physicians’ participation in qiṣāṣ is not appropriate. First, qiṣāṣ is in sharp contrast to the Hippocratic Oath and other codes of medical ethics. Second, by physicians’ participation in qiṣāṣ, medical practices are being used improperly to carry out government mandates. Third, physician participation in activities that cause intentional harm to people destroys the trust between patients and physicians and may adversely affect the patient–physician relationship more generally. From the standpoint of Shari’a, there is no consensus among Muslim scholars whether qiṣāṣ should be performed on every occasion. We argue that disallowing physician involvement in qiṣāṣ is necessary from the perspectives of both medical ethics and Shari’a law.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Islamic Biomedical Ethics: Principles and Application.Abdulaziz Sachedina - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Playing God.C. A. J. Coady - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press. pp. 155--180.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Are There Some Things Doctors Just Shouldn't Do?Robert D. Truog - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (3):3-3.
Physicians, Medical Ethics, and Capital Punishment.Timothy F. Murphy - 2005 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 16 (2):160.
The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment: A Philosophical Discussion.Joseph B. R. Gaie - 2004 - Kluwer Academic.
Physician Participation in Executions, the Morality of Capital Punishment, and the Practical Implications of Their Relationship.Paul Litton - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (1):333-352.
Professingmedicine Strengthening the Ethics and Professionalism of Tomorrow's Physicians.American Medical Association - 2001 - American Medical Association Press.
Flouting the Demands of Justice? Physician Participation in Executions.Adam Kadlac - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (5):505-522.
Rabghuzi's Stories of the ProphetsAl-Rabghūzī, The Stories of the Prophets, Qiṣaṣ Al-Anbiyāʾ, An Eastern Turkish Version.Al-Rabghuzi, The Stories of the Prophets, Qisas Al-Anbiya, An Eastern Turkish Version. Two Volumes.Robert Dankoff, H. E. Boeschoten & M. Vandamme - 1997 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 117 (1):115.
Physician Participation in Executions: Care Giver or Executioner?Peter A. Clark - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):95-104.
Muslim Medical Ethics: From Theory to Practice.Jonathan E. Brockopp & Thomas Eich (eds.) - 2008 - University of South Carolina Press.
The Ethics of Soviet Medical Practice: Behaviours and Attitudes of Physicians in Soviet Estonia.D. A. Barr - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1):33-40.
Clinical Ethics: Medical Chaperoning at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia: Survey of Physicians. E. Al-Gaai & M. Hammami - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (12):729-732.