Abstract
Euthanasia is one of the controversial topics in current medical ethics. Among the six well-known types of euthanasia, passive voluntary euthanasia seems to be more plausible in comparison with other types, from the moral point of view.According to the Kantian framework, ethical features come from 'reason'. Maxims are formulated as categorical imperative which has three different versions. Moreover, the second version of categorical imperative which is dubbed 'principle of ends' is associated with human dignity. It follows from this that human dignity has an indisputable role in the Kantian story. On the other hand, there are two main theological schools in Islamic tradition which are called: Ash'arite and Mu'tazilite. Moreover, there are two main Islamic branches: Shiite and Sunni. From the theological point of view, Shiite's theoretical framework is similar to the Mu'tazilite one.According to Shiite and Mu'tazilite perspectives, moral goodness and badness can be discovered by reason, on its own. Accordingly, bioethical judgments can be made based on the very concept of human dignity rather than merely resorting to the Holy Scripture or religious jurisprudential deliberations. As far as PVE is concerned, the majority of Shiite scholars do not recognize a person's right to die voluntarily. Similarly, on the basis of Kantian ethical themes, PVE is immoral, categorically speaking. According to Shiite framework, however, PVE could be moral in some ethical contexts. In other words, in such contexts, the way in which Shiite scholars deal with PVE is more similar to Rossian ethics rather than the Kantian one.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,836
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mental Illness, Natural Death, and Non-Voluntary Passive Euthanasia.Jukka Varelius - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):635-648.
An Argument in Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia.Hossein Atrak - 2019 - Philosophical Investigations 13 (28):221-234.
Japanese Attitudes Toward Euthanasia In Hypothetical Clinical Situations.Noritoshi Tanida - 1998 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 8 (5):138-141.
Buddhist Approach to Euthanasia.Pramod Kumar - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 20:9-13.
Passive Euthanasia.E. Garrard - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):65-68.
Passive Euthanasia. E. Garrard & S. Wilkinson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):64-68.
Human Dignity and Human Rights in Bioethics: The Kantian Approach.Markus Rothhaar - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (3):251-257.
Understanding Kant's Ethics.Michael Cholbi - 2016 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-06

Total views
2 ( #1,382,439 of 2,426,071 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,466 of 2,426,071 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes