In this paper we make some general remarks on the use of non-classical logics, in particular paraconsistent logic, in the foundational analysis of physical theories. As a case-study, we present a reconstruction of P.\ -D.\ F\'evrier's 'logic of complementarity' as a strict three-valued logic and also a paraconsistent version of it. At the end, we sketch our own approach to complementarity, which is based on a paraconsistent logic termed 'paraclassical logic'.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox.Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron - 2009 - Principia 13 (3):299-326.
On Partial and Paraconsistent Logics.Reinhard Muskens - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):352-374.
Ideal Paraconsistent Logics.O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic.Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli - 1986 - Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #77,315 of 2,158,394 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #64,994 of 2,158,394 )
How can I increase my downloads?