Spinoza, Ecology and International Law: Radical Naturalism in the Face of the Anthropocene

Routledge (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book addresses the use of Benedict Spinoza's philosophy in current attempts to elaborate an ecological basis for international environmental law. Because the question of environmental protection has not been satisfactory resolved, the legal debate concerning our responsibility for the environment has - as evidenced in the recent UN report series Harmony with Nature - come to invite calls for a new eco-centric, rather than anthropocentric, legal paradigm. In this respect, Spinoza appears as a key figure. He is one of the few philosophers in the history of western philosophy who cares, and writes extensively, about the roots of anthropocentrism; the core issue of contemporary normative debates in ecology. And in response to the rapidly developing ecological crisis, his work has become central to a re-thinking of the human relationship with nature. Addressing the contention that Spinoza's ethics might provide a useful source for developing a new, eco-centred framework for environmental law, this book elaborates a more nuanced understanding of Spinoza's philosophy. Spinoza cannot, it is argued here, simply be reduced to an eco-ethicist. That is: his metaphysics cannot be used as basis of an essentially naturalised or extended human morality. At the same time, however, this book argues that the radicality of Spinoza's naturalism nevertheless offers the possibility of developing a more adequate ecological basis for environmental law.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza and ecology revisted.K. L. F. Houle - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):417-431.
Spinoza on Skepticism.Dominik Perler - 2013 - In Michael Della Rocca (ed.), The Oxford Handbook to Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 220-239.
Spinoza and the possibilities for radical climate ethics.Hasana Sharp - 2017 - Dialogues in Human Geography 7 (2):156-60.
Spinoza: naturaleza y ecosistema.Luciano Espinosa Rubio - 1995 - Salamanca: Universidad Pontificia.
The Limits of Anthropocene Narratives.Zoltán Boldizsár Simon - 2020 - European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2):184-199.
The Political Theory of Radical Ecology.Richard Francis Mosher - 1995 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
Postcritical knowledge ecology in the Anthropocene.Yoshifumi Nakagawa & Phillip G. Payne - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (6):559-571.
Living the anthropocene from ‘the end of nature’ to ethical prospects.Jan Gresil S. Kahambing - 2019 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29 (4):145-149.
Was Spinoza a Naturalist?Alexander Douglas - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):77-99.
Ecology Re-naturalized.Leon Niemoczynski - 2014 - In Leon Niemoczynski Nam T. Nguyen (ed.), A Philosophy of Sacred Nature: Prospects for Ecstatic Naturalism. Lexington Books. pp. 113-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
13 (#973,701)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references