The Ten Most Common Objections to Sex Selection and Why They Fail To Be Conclusive

Reproductive Biomedicine Online 14 (1):158-161 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After its review of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 1990, the Department of Health concluded that the British Parliament ought to outlaw sex selection for any but the most serious of medical reasons. This paper reviews the most frequently expressed objections to social sex selection and concludes that there is simply no moral justification for prohibiting parents from using sex selection technology to balance their families.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-10

Downloads
1,075 (#21,034)

6 months
175 (#25,782)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edgar Dahl
Universität Giessen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Law, Liberty, and Morality.H. L. A. Hart - 1963 - Stanford University Press.
Gendercide: The Implications of Sex Selection.Mary Anne Warren - 1985 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sex Selection: The Case for.Julian Savulescu - 1999 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer, Bioethics: An Anthology. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 2--145.
Preconception gender selection.John A. Robertson - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.

View all 17 references / Add more references