An Analysis of US Trade Deficits-Why Dollar Depreciation Shows Little Effects

Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:11-17 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the exchange rate, domestic absorption, and the relationship between direct investment and trade three angles, using annual data from the United States 1980-2004, obtained through a simple OLS method the U.S. import and export equations, can reveal the main reason affecting the U.S. trade deficit, and the U.S. dollar the impact of devaluation on the trade deficit, the results showed that: depreciation of the dollar impact on exports rather than imports, mainly through improved trade balance, but there is a lag period of 2 years, the depreciation of the dollar as of now, and no significant improvement in trade deficit; From the income effect, due to HM Revenue asymmetric effect exists, to reduce foreign trade deficit requires the United States is relatively more substantial consolidation; from direct investment and trade relations, U.S. foreign direct investment, transfer of their supply, increased U.S. imports. Large reductions in U.S. trade deficit can not simply rely on the U.S. dollar depreciation, but need long-term structural adjustment in 2006, the U.S. trade deficit will be further expanded. This paper tries to build a model to explain how exchange rate, domestic and external income, and direct foreign investment have influenced US 'import and export during 1980-2004. Based on OLS simulation of import and export equation, it displays the main causes of US's trade deficits and tries to explain why dollar's depreciation shows little impact on her deficit improvement. Our conclusion is: 1, Dollar's depreciation helps recovering trade balance only with 2-years delay by improving exports while having little effects on imports, so by now it can hardly reduce US 'trade deficits extensively. 2, From perspective of income, due to the HM Income Asymmetry Effects, much contraction is needed in domestic economy than that of abroad to reduce the deficits. 3, The increasing of FDI enlarges the trade deficits . According to our estimation, US 'trade deficits will expand in 2006. Without a long term structural adjustment, it is hard to expect reducing trade deficits significantly by dollar's depreciation alone

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dependent Degree on International Trade and China's International Trade Interest.Jia-Dong Tong - 2005 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:16-22.
On the Foundations of Hysteresis in Economic Systems.Rod Cross - 1993 - Economics and Philosophy 9 (1):53.
Free Trade and the Environment.Nicole Hassoun - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (1):51-66.
Of Perfecting the System of Foreign Trade Agency in China.Jian Sun - 1997 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:55-60.
Free trade and environmental economics.Roger Paden - 1994 - Agriculture and Human Values 11 (1):47-54.
Three scenarios for the world economy.Robert Z. Aliber - 1988 - Ethics and International Affairs 2:37–62.
The university and the moral imperative of fair trade coffee.Gavin Fridell - 2004 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (1):141-159.
Foreign Trade in the Light of Circulation Analysis.Bruce Anderson - 2001 - Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 1:9-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references