Authors
Edmund Dain
Providence College
Abstract
What nonsense might be, and what Wittgenstein thought that nonsense might be, are two of the central questions in the current debate between those—such as Cora Diamond, James Conant and Michael Kremer—who favour a “resolute” approach to Wittgenstein’s work, and those—such as P. M. S. Hacker and Hans-Johann Glock—who instead favour a more “traditional” approach. What answer we give to these questions will determine the nature and force of his criticisms of traditional philosophy, and so the very shape Wittgenstein’s work has for us, as well as, to some extent, what the lesson of the Tractatus might be. My aim in this paper is to provide a detailed defence of the austere view of nonsense, that lies at the heart of the resolute approach, against a range of influentialcriticisms developed by Hans-Johann Glock and which focus on Wittgenstein’s contextualism. In so doing, I hope also to shed some light on the kind of view the austere view is, as well as how it might relate to certain other crucial aspects of Wittgenstein’s thought
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Wittgenstein  Contextualism  Nonsense  Compositionality
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1053-8364
DOI 10.5840/jpr_2008_8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,666
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nonsense Made Intelligible.Hans-Johann Glock - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (1):111-136.
Wittgenstein’s Argument for the Context Principle in the Tractatus.Jasper Liptow - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (2):224-244.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Contextualism and Nonsense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Edmund Dain - 2006 - South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):91-101.
The New Wittgenstein (Review). [REVIEW]Anton Alterman - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (3):456-457.
The New Wittgenstein: A Critique.Ian Proops - 2001 - European Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):375–404.
Wittgenstein and Nonsense: Psychologism, Kantianism, and the Habitus.José Medina - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (3):293 – 318.
A “Resolute” Later Wittgenstein?Genia Schönbaumsfeld - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (5):649-668.
Wittgenstein, Carnap and the New American Wittgensteinians.P. M. S. Hacker - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):01–23.
All Kinds of Nonsense.Hans-Johann Glock - 2004 - In Erich Ammereller & Eugen Fisher (eds.), Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. Routledge. pp. 221-245.
Ineffability and Nonsense.Peter Sullivan - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):195–223.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total views
84 ( #113,214 of 2,349,170 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #331,146 of 2,349,170 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes