Geach and Ascriptivism: Beside the Point


Authors
Luís Duarte D'Almeida
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
This paper discusses the first incarnation of what came to be known as the “Frege-Geach” point. The point was made by Peter Geach in his 1960 essay “Ascriptivism”, and developed in “Assertion”, a 1965 piece. Geach’s articles launch a wholesale attack on theories of non-descriptive performances advanced by “some Oxford philosophers” whom he accuses of ignoring “the distinction between calling a thing ‘P’ and predicating ‘P’ of a thing”. One view that Geach specifically targets is H. L. A. Hart’s claim that sentences of the form “X φ-ed” are not primarily descriptive but ascriptive of responsibility for actions. Hart explicitly accepted Geach’s criticism, and disowned his essay. I argue that he was wrong to do so. Perhaps the essay was worth retracting, but not because of Geach’s objections. I begin by restating and refining Geach’s arguments, in order to bring out the flaw he claimed to have detected in the “pattern of philosophising” that he took Hart’s essay to exemplify. I go on to argue that Geach’s original point poses no obstacle either to non-descriptivism in general, or to Hart’s sui generis non-descriptivist claim in particular.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.15173/jhap.v4i6.2961
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,413
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Frege-Geach Problem?Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):703-720.
Other Minds.J. Wisdom, J. L. Austen, J. L. Austin & A. J. Ayer - 1946 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20:122-197.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peter Geach and “The Frege Point”.Roger M. White - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (1-2):133-149.
Ascriptivism.P. T. Geach - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (2):221-225.
Geach on Generalization.Charles Sayward - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (2):221-.
Relative Identity and Cardinality.Patricia Blanchette - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):205 - 223.
Geach on Proper Names.David Boersema - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:37-42.
The Frege‐Geach Point.Paul Horwich - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):78–93.
Non-Descriptive Negation for Normative Sentences.Andrew Alwood - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (262):1-25.
What is the Frege-Geach Problem?Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):703-720.
Geachianism.Patrick Todd - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:222-251.
Geach, Aristotle and Predicate Logics.Alex Orenstein - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 38 (1-2):96-114.
Assertion.P. T. Geach - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):449-465.
Quasi-Realism, Negation and the Frege-Geach Problem.Nicholas Unwin - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):337-352.
Bibliography of Works of Pt Geach.Harry A. Lewis - 1991 - In H. G. Lewis (ed.), Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 213--307.
Selected Correspondence with Geach.Harry A. Lewis - 1991 - In H. G. Lewis (ed.), Peter Geach: Philosophical Encounters. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 27.
Geach on `Good'.Charles R. Pigden - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (159):129-154.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-03

Total views
24 ( #394,918 of 2,291,346 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #396,808 of 2,291,346 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature