This paper investigates the reciprocal implications between aesthetics and technics, to show how technicity, as a cultural and symbolic attitude, is constitutively rooted in the aesthetic dimension of human experience. The analysis conducted aims to bring into focus the originarity of technicity in the development of the living body, understood in its inseparable connection with the mind, as junction between the sensible and the symbolic, the organic and the cultural, the perceptive and the expressive. I address this question through a parallel analysis of Simondon’s groundbreaking reflection on technics and the less explored account of technics in Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy. If the latter inscribes our attitude towards technics in the motricity and symbolism inherent to the living body, the former ascribes to aesthetics a form of thinking, thus playing a fundamental role in our relationship to the technical dimension. Despite the differences in their approach to technics, I combine their theoretical perspectives to encompass their internal limits and to outline possible convergences.
Keywords Merleau-Ponty  Technics  aesthetic thinking  techno-aesthetics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.13128/aisthesis-25623
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Aesthetics of Nature Consequences of Merleau-Ponty’s Embodied Ontology.مارک واندن بوسه - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 6 (11):129-137.
Imagining Bodies with Merleau-Ponty.James B. Steeves - 2000 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
Vilém Flussers Technik Begriff.Johanna Lang & Karen Koch - 2013 - Flusser Studies 16 (1).
Aesthetic Turn: From Thinking as Noesis to Thinking as Listening to My Living Body.Hans Feger - 2017 - Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2017 (2):133-148.
Aesthetics.Harold Osborne - 1972 - London: Oxford University Press.
Body.David Morris - 2008 - In Rosalyn Diprose & Jack Reynolds (eds.), Merleau-ponty: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing. pp. 111-120.
Artwork as Technics.Mark Jackson - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (13).
What Changes with the Shift of the Concept of Technology.Saulius Kanišauskas - 2015 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 23 (1):35-43.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #772,591 of 2,520,355 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,012 of 2,520,355 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes