Impossible laws

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):309-327 (1997)

Authors
Robert D'Amico
University of Florida
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839319702700302
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Concepts of Supervenience.Jaegwon Kim - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (December):153-76.
Intentionalistic Explanations in the Social Sciences.John R. Searle - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):332-344.
Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Essays in ethical theory.R. M. Hare - 1992 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 1:119-120.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Could the Laws of Nature Change?Marc Lange - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (1):69-92.
Why Even Kim-Style Psychophysical Laws Are Impossible.Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):225-237.
There May Be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, After All.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.
A Peircean Theory of Decision.Berit Brogaard - 1999 - Synthese 118 (3):383-401.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
23 ( #412,065 of 2,291,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #302,769 of 2,291,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature