Social Theory and Practice 46 (3):467-496 (2020)

Authors
John Danaher
University College, Galway
Abstract
This article argues that access to meaningful sexual experience should be included within the set of the goods that are subject to principles of distributive justice. It argues that some people are currently unjustly excluded from meaningful sexual experience and it is not implausible to suggest that they might thereby have certain claim rights to sexual inclusion. This does not entail that anyone has a right to sex with another person, but it does entail that duties may be imposed on society to foster greater sexual inclusion. This is a controversial thesis and this article addresses this controversy by engaging with four major objections to it: the misogyny objection; the impossibility objection; the stigmatisation objection; and the unjust social engineering objection.
Keywords sexual justice  sexual inclusion  distributive justice  equality  well-being  rights  misogyny
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract202042293
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sexual Desire and Structural Injustice.Tom O’Shea - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sexual Rights, Disability and Sex Robots.Ezio Di Nucci - forthcoming - In John Danaher & Neil McArthur (eds.), Sex Robots. MIT Press.
Disability and Sexual Inclusion.Tracy De Boer - 2015 - Hypatia 30 (1):66-81.
The Sexual Pleasure View of Sexual Desire.Raja Halwani - 2020 - Philosophical Papers 49 (1):107-137.
Sexual Rights Puzzle: Re-Solved?Ezio Di Nucci - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (5):337-338.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-26

Total views
3,268 ( #733 of 2,425,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
394 ( #958 of 2,425,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes