Back to the Present: Defending Presentist Time Travel

Disputatio 4 (33):469 - 484 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here I defend the compatibility of presentism and time travel against a few objections. Keller and Nelson argue that, if presentism is at all plausible, presentism and time travel are as compatible as eternalism and time travel. But Miller and Sider are not convinced. I reply that for their concerns to have merit, Miller and Sider must assume presentists are committed to positions they need not be; I explain why presentists are not so committed and, in the process, defend Keller and Nelson’s position that there is no roadblock to presentist time travel that does not also apply to eternalist time travel.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-06

Downloads
928 (#16,878)

6 months
127 (#39,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Richard Daniels
Monash University

References found in this work

The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David K. Lewis - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):145-152.
Presentism and properties.John Bigelow - 1996 - Philosophical Perspectives 10:35-52.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel.David Lewis - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas (eds.), Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophical Papers: Volume 2.David Lewis - 1987 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Time Travel and the Open Future.Kristie Miller - 2005 - Disputatio 1 (19):223 - 232.

View all 12 references / Add more references