Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 7 (2):267-296 (2016)
The meaning of an utterance is often enriched by the pragmatic context in which it is uttered. This is because in ordinary conversations we routinely and uncontroversially compress what we say, safe in the knowledge that those interpreting us will ‘add in’ the content we intend to communicate. Does the same thing hold true in the case of legal utterances like ‘This constitution protects the personal rights of the citizen’ or ‘the parliament shall have the power to lay and collect taxes’? This article addresses this question from the perspective of the constitutional originalist—the person who holds that the meaning of a constitutional text is fixed at some historical moment. In doing so, it advances four theses. First, it argues that every originalist theory is committed to some degree of pragmatic enrichment, the debate is about how much. Second, that in determining which content gets ‘added in’, originalists typically hold to a common knowledge standard for enrichment, protestations...
|Keywords||Originalism Constitutional Interpretation Pragmatic Enrichment Common Knowledge Andrei Marmor Philosophy of Law Linguistic Philosophy Textualism Constitutional Theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Normativity of Linguistic Originalism: A Speech Act Analysis.John Danaher - 2015 - Law and Philosophy 34 (4):397-431.
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning.David Lyons - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):75.
Reading the Constitution: An Entanglement and Still Arguable Question.Cecilia Tohaneanu - 2010 - Romanian Review of Political Sciences and International Relations (1).
Pragmatic Enrichment as Coherence Raising.Peter Pagin - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):59-100.
The Challenge of Originalism: Essays in Constitutional Theory.Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):682-702.
Subsentential Utterances, Ellipsis, and Pragmatic Enrichment.Alison Hall - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):222-250.
Beguiled by Metaphors: The ‘Living Tree’ and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada.Bradley Miller - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (2):331-354.
The Argument for (Living) Originalism: Comments on Jack Balkin's Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.Re'em Segev - 2013 - Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies.
The Unjust Enrichment Fallacy and Private Law.Peter Jaffey - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1):115-136.
Added to index2015-05-20
Total downloads218 ( #17,946 of 2,178,194 )
Recent downloads (6 months)30 ( #9,485 of 2,178,194 )
How can I increase my downloads?