Common Knowledge, Pragmatic Enrichment and Thin Originalism

Abstract
The meaning of an utterance is often enriched by the pragmatic context in which it is uttered. This is because in ordinary conversations we routinely and uncontroversially compress what we say, safe in the knowledge that those interpreting us will ‘add in’ the content we intend to communicate. Does the same thing hold true in the case of legal utterances like ‘This constitution protects the personal rights of the citizen’ or ‘the parliament shall have the power to lay and collect taxes’? This article addresses this question from the perspective of the constitutional originalist—the person who holds that the meaning of a constitutional text is fixed at some historical moment. In doing so, it advances four theses. First, it argues that every originalist theory is committed to some degree of pragmatic enrichment, the debate is about how much. Second, that in determining which content gets ‘added in’, originalists typically hold to a common knowledge standard for enrichment, protestations...
Keywords Originalism  Constitutional Interpretation  Pragmatic Enrichment  Common Knowledge  Andrei Marmor  Philosophy of Law  Linguistic Philosophy  Textualism  Constitutional Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
DOI 10.1080/20403313.2015.1065644
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning.David Lyons - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):75.
Reading the Constitution: An Entanglement and Still Arguable Question.Cecilia Tohaneanu - 2010 - Romanian Review of Political Sciences and International Relations (1).
Pragmatic Enrichment as Coherence Raising.Peter Pagin - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):59-100.
Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):682-702.
Subsentential Utterances, Ellipsis, and Pragmatic Enrichment.Alison Hall - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):222-250.
Pragmatic Contextualism.Geoff Pynn - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (1):26-51.
Free Enrichment or Hidden Indexicals?Alison Hall - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (4):426-456.
The Unjust Enrichment Fallacy and Private Law.Peter Jaffey - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26 (1):115-136.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2015-05-20

Total downloads

218 ( #17,946 of 2,178,194 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

30 ( #9,485 of 2,178,194 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums