Classical second-order intensional logic with maximal propositions

Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):1 - 31 (1977)
Abstract
By the standards presented in the Introduction, CMFC2 is deficient on at least one ontological ground: ‘∀’ is a syncategorematic expression and so CMFC2 is not an ideal language. To some there may be an additional difficulty: any two wffs provably equivalent in the classical sense are provably identical. We hope in sequel to present systems free of these difficulties, free either of one or the other, or perhaps both.This work was done with the aid of Canada Council Grant S74-0551-S1
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00262046
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.W. V. Quine - 1960 - MIT Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
19 ( #267,836 of 2,202,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,722 of 2,202,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature