Classical second-order intensional logic with maximal propositions

Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):1 - 31 (1977)

Abstract
By the standards presented in the Introduction, CMFC2 is deficient on at least one ontological ground: ‘∀’ is a syncategorematic expression and so CMFC2 is not an ideal language. To some there may be an additional difficulty: any two wffs provably equivalent in the classical sense are provably identical. We hope in sequel to present systems free of these difficulties, free either of one or the other, or perhaps both.This work was done with the aid of Canada Council Grant S74-0551-S1
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00262046
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.W. QUINE - 1960 - MIT Press.
Past, Present and Future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Clarendon Press.
Introduction to Mathematical Logic.ALONZO CHURCH - 1944 - London: Oxford University PRess.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
23 ( #383,108 of 2,272,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #828,909 of 2,272,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature