George Berkeley and Early Modern Philosophy

New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is a study of the philosophy of the early 18th century Irish philosopher George Berkeley in the intellectual context of his times, with a particular focus on how, for Berkeley, mind is related to its ideas. It does not assume that thinkers like Descartes, Malebranche, or Locke define for Berkeley the context in which he develops his own thought. Instead, he indicates how Berkeley draws on a tradition that informed his early training and that challenges much of the early modern thought with which he is often associated. Specifically, the book indicates how Berkeley's distinctive treatment of mind (as the activity whereby objects are differentiated and related to one another) highlights how mind neither precedes the existence of objects nor exists independently of them. This distinctive way of understanding the relation of mind and objects allows Berkeley to appropriate ideas from his contemporaries in a manner that transforms the issues with which he is engaged. The resulting insights--for example, about how God creates the minds that perceive objects--are only now starting to be fully appreciated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-20

Downloads
19 (#811,075)

6 months
7 (#624,553)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen H. Daniel
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Did Berkeley Endorse the Resemblance Theory of Representation?Dávid Bartha - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 27-48.
Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs.Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.) - 2024 - Boston: De Gruyter.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references