How Berkeley Redefines Substance

Berkeley Studies 24:40-50 (2013)

Authors
Stephen H. Daniel
Texas A&M University
Abstract
In several essays I have argued that Berkeley maintains the same basic notion of spiritual substance throughout his life. Because that notion is not the traditional (Aristotelian, Cartesian, or Lockean) doctrine of substance, critics (e.g., John Roberts, Tom Stoneham, Talia Mae Bettcher, Margaret Atherton, Walter Ott, Marc Hight) claim that on my reading Berkeley either endorses a Humean notion of substance or has no recognizable theory of substance at all. In this essay I point out how my interpretation does not assume that Berkeley adopts a bundle theory of mind, but instead redefines what it means for a simple substance to be the principle by which ideas are perceived.
Keywords Berkeley  substance  bundle
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Coherence of Berkeley's Theory of Mind.Margaret Atherton - 1983 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (3):389-399.
Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction.Walter Ott - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.
An Examination of the Bundle-Theory of Substance.Kwame Gyekye - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1):51-61.
On Hume's Defense of Berkeley.Alan Schwerin - 2015 - Open Journal of Philosophy 5 (6):327 - 337.
Berkeley's Central Argument Against Material Substance.A. D. Smith - 1985 - In John Foster & Howard Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford University Press.
Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - Idealistic Studies 31 (1):55-72.
Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.Stephen H. Daniel - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):239-258.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-08-07

Total views
430 ( #9,838 of 2,235,936 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #3,170 of 2,235,936 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature