Indiscernibility and perception: A reply to Joseph Margolis

British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (4):321-329 (1999)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Aesthetics  Chemistry  Painting  Perception  Margolis, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/39.4.321
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Farewell to Danto and Goodman.Joseph Margolis - 1998 - British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):353-374.
The Radical Nature of Margolis' Relativism.B. Richard Beatch - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.
Perception, Inference, and Mediation.Joseph Margolis - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (4):119-123.
Pain and Perception.Joseph Margolis - 1976 - International Studies in Philosophy 8:3-12.
A Closer Look at Danto's Account of Art and Perception.J. Margolis - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (3):326-339.
Sibley on Aesthetic Perception.Joseph Margolis - 1966 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25 (2):155-158.
Aesthetic Perception.Joseph Margolis - 1960 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (2):209-213.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
148 ( #32,548 of 2,180,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,536 of 2,180,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums