Necessary Moral Truths and Theistic Metaethics

Sophia 53 (3):309-330 (2014)
Abstract
Theistic metaethics usually places one key restriction on the explanation of moral facts, namely: every moral fact must ultimately be explained by some fact about God. But the widely held belief that moral truths are necessary truths seems to undermine this claim. If a moral truth is necessary, then it seems like it neither needs nor has an explanation. Or so the objection typically goes. Recently, two proponents of theistic metaethics — William Lane Craig and Mark Murphy — have argued that this objection is flawed. They claim that even if a truth is necessary, it does not follow that it neither needs nor has an explanation. In this article, I challenge Craig and Murphy’s reasoning on three main grounds. First, I argue that the counterexamples they use to undermine the necessary truth objection to theistic metaethics are flawed. While they may provide some support for the notion that necessary truths can be explained, they do not provide support for the notion that necessary moral truths can be explained. Second, I argue that the principles of explanation that Murphy and Craig use to support theistic metaethics are either question-begging (in the case of Murphy) or improperly motivated (in the case of Craig). And third, I provide a general defence of the claim that necessary moral truths neither need nor have an explanation
Keywords Metaethics  Necessary truths  Theism  Explanation  William Lane Craig  Mark Murphy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-013-0390-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Essays in Quasi-Realism.Simon Blackburn - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
In Defense of Non-Natural Theistic Realism.William J. Wainwright - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):457-463.
Against Moral Truths.Seungbae Park - 2012 - Cultura 9 (1):179-194.
Divine Command Theory and Theistic Activism.Simin Rahimi - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):551-559.
Craig on God and Morality.Thomas W. Smythe & Michael Rectenwald - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):331 - 338.
Constructivism in Metaethics.Carla Bagnoli - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Could Morality Have a Source?Chris Heathwood - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-19.
Morality and God.Richard Swinburne - 2003 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 57 (225):315 - 328.
The Price of Non-Reductive Moral Realism.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):199-215.
Moral Explanations.Neil Sinclair - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell.
Moral Principles As Moral Dispositions.Luke Robinson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):289-309.
Added to PP index
2013-10-17

Total downloads
492 ( #3,908 of 2,191,353 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #1,766 of 2,191,353 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature