Filosofia Unisinos 18 (3):195-200 (2017)

Authors
Danilo Fraga Dantas
Federal University of Paraiba
Abstract
All reasoners described in the most widespread models of a rational reasoner exhibit logical omniscience, which is impossible for finite reasoners (real reasoners). The most common strategy for dealing with the problem of logical omniscience is to interpret the models using a notion of beliefs different from explicit beliefs. For example, the models could be interpreted as describing the beliefs that the reasoner would hold if the reasoner were able reason indefinitely (stable beliefs). Then the models would describe maximum rationality, which a finite reasoner can only approach in the limit of a reasoning sequence. This strategy has important consequences for epistemology. If a finite reasoner can only approach maximum rationality in the limit of a reasoning sequence, then the efficiency of reasoning is epistemically (and not only pragmatically) relevant. In this paper, I present an argument to this conclusion and discuss its consequences, as, for example, the vindication of the principle 'no rationality through brute-force'.
Keywords Finite Reasoning  Logical Omniscience   Efficient Reasoning  Asymptotic analysis  Computational complexity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.4013/fsu.2017.183.11
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Theory of Epistemic Rationality.Richard Foley - 1987 - Harvard University Press.
The Theory of Epistemic Rationality.Hilary Kornblith & Richard Foley - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (1):131.
Possible Worlds.Christopher Menzel - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Logical Omniscience.Mattias Skipper Rasmussen - 2015 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 24 (3):377-399.
Using Abstract Resources to Control Reasoning.Richard W. Weyhrauch, Marco Cadoli & Carolyn L. Talcott - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (1):77-101.
Ideal Reasoners Don’T Believe in Zombies.Danilo Fraga Dantas - 2017 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 21 (1):41-59.
The Impossibility of Inverted Reasoners.Murali Ramachandran - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):499-502.
Logical Omniscience as Infeasibility.Sergei Artemov & Roman Kuznets - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):6-25.
A Dynamic Solution to the Problem of Logical Omniscience.Mattias Skipper & Jens Bjerring - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (3):501-521.
Pushing the Bounds of Rationality: Argumentation and Extended Cognition.David Godden - 2016 - In Fabio Paglieri, Laura Bonelli & Silvia Felletti (eds.), The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion. London: College Publications. pp. 67-83.
Broome on Reasoning.Conor McHugh & Jonathan Way - 2015 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 34 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-04-20

Total views
259 ( #42,015 of 2,505,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #40,159 of 2,505,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes