Microbial Biotechnology 11 (4):588-605 (2018)

Antoine Danchin
University of Hong Kong
Science and engineering rely on the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge to make discoveries and create new designs. Discovery-driven genome research rests on knowledge passed on via gene annotations. In response to the deluge of sequencing big data, standard annotation practice employs automated procedures that rely on majority rules. We argue this hinders progress through the generation and propagation of errors, leading investigators into blind alleys. More subtly, this inductive process discourages the discovery of novelty, which remains essential in biological research and reflects the nature of biology itself. Annotation systems, rather than being repositories of facts, should be tools that support multiple modes of inference. By combining deduction, induction and abduction, investigators can generate hypotheses when accurate knowledge is extracted from model databases. A key stance is to depart from ‘the sequence tells the structure tells the function’ fallacy, placing function first. We illustrate our approach with examples of critical or unexpected pathways, using MicroScope to demonstrate how tools can be implemented following the principles we advocate. We end with a challenge to the reader.
Keywords Bertrand's paradox  Correspondence Analysis  mutual information  Data structure
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
Varieties of Clinical Reasoning.Jonathan W. Bolton - 2015 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):486-489.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bodies of Data: Genomic Data and Bioscience Data Sharing.Pilar Ossorio - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (4):907-932.
Bodies of Data: Genomic Data and Bioscience Data Sharing.Pilar N. Ossorio - 2011 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 78 (3):907-932.
Data Interpretation in the Digital Age.Sabina Leonelli - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (3):397-417.
Data Fusion with Probabilistic Conditional Logic.Jens Fisseler & Imre Fehér - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (4):488-507.
Minding the Gap: Annotation as Preparation for Discussion.José Alfonso Feito & Patricia Donahue - 2008 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 7 (2):295-307.


Added to PP index

Total views
110 ( #99,039 of 2,454,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #65,155 of 2,454,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes