Reinhold Niebuhr's Paradox: Groundwork for Social Responsibility

Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):121-123 (2003)

Abstract
This paper is an examination of Reinhold Niebuhr's embrace of the paradoxical in relation to his conception of the self. While it explores the theoretical and practical difficulties entailed in Niebuhr's account, it also seeks to defend his position, suggesting that in the light of Niebuhr's negative apologetic, the paradoxical self represents the only intelligible means of self-understanding available. Though Niebuhr never develops this epistemological ground, it may provide a way of avoiding the moral consequentialism to which Niebuhr appears to be resigned. The resulting framework points toward moral pragmatism, retaining its orientation and relevance in the midst of deliberations concerning means and ends
Keywords self  Reinhold Niebuhr  paradox  epistemology  pragmatism  freedom
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9795.00124
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reason and Emotion in the Ethics of Self‐Restraint.Daniel A. Morris - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):495-515.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
17 ( #541,252 of 2,289,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #584,403 of 2,289,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature