Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):71-95 (2017)
Soon there will be sex robots. The creation of such devices raises a host of social, legal and ethical questions. In this article, I focus in on one of them. What if these sex robots are deliberately designed and used to replicate acts of rape and child sexual abuse? Should the creation and use of such robots be criminalised, even if no person is harmed by the acts performed? I offer an argument for thinking that they should be. The argument consists of two premises. The first claims that it can be a proper object of the criminal law to regulate wrongful conduct with no extrinsically harmful effects on others. The second claims that the use of robots that replicate acts of rape and child sexual abuse would be wrongful, even if such usage had no extrinsically harmful effects on others. I defend both premises of this argument and consider its implications for the criminal law. I do not offer a conclusive argument for criminalisation, nor would I wish to be interpreted as doing so; instead, I offer a tentative argument and a framework for future debate. This framework may also lead one to question the proposed rationales for criminalisation.
|Keywords||Criminal law Criminalisation Robots Robot Ethics Rape Sexual Abuse|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Criminalising Fabricated Images of Child Pornography:A Matter of Harm or Morality?Suzanne Ost - unknown
Expert Evidence As Context: Historical Patterns and Contemporary Attitudes in the Prosecution of Sexual Offences.Fiona E. Raitt - 2004 - Feminist Legal Studies 12 (2):233-244.
Robot Companions for Children with Down Syndrome: A Case Study.Hagen Lehmann, Iolanda Iacono, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Patrizia Marti & Ben Robins - 2014 - Interaction Studies 15 (1):99-112.
Framework for a Church Response, Report of the Irish Catholic Bishops' Advisory Committee on Child Sexual Abuse by Priests and Religious.Child Sexual Abuse - forthcoming - Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS.
Sexual Abuse, Modern Freedom, and Heidegger's Philosophy.Natalie Nenadic - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:111-126.
Ethics and the Forensic Expert: A Case Study of Child Custody Involving Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse.Kathryn Kuehnle - 1998 - Ethics and Behavior 8 (1):1 – 18.
Jurisdictions of Sexual Assault: Reforming the Texts and Testimony of Rape in Australia. [REVIEW]Peter D. Rush - 2011 - Feminist Legal Studies 19 (1):47-73.
Just War Theory, Crimes of War, and War Rape.Sally Scholz - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):143-157.
Is It Rape? On Acquaintance Rape and Taking Women's Consent Seriously - by Joan McGregor, Making Sense of Sexual Consent - by Mark Cowling & Paul Reynolds, the Logic of Consent, the Diversity and Deceptiveness of Consent as a Defence to Criminal Conduct - by Peter Westen, and Consent to Sexual Relations - by Lan Wertheimer.David Archard - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):209–221.
Present and Future Instances of Virtual Rape in Light of Three Categories of Legal Philosophical Theories on Rape.Litska Strikwerda - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (4):491-510.
Sexual Specificity, Rape Law Reform and the Feminist Quest for Justice.Louise Du Toit - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):465-483.
Conceptually Situating the Harm of Rape: An Analysis of Objectification.L. Kelland - 2011 - South African Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):168-183.
Added to index2014-12-06
Total downloads483 ( #3,644 of 2,158,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)145 ( #766 of 2,158,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?