Sex Work, Technological Unemployment and the Basic Income Guarantee

Journal of Evolution and Technology 24 (1):113-130 (2014)
Authors
John Danaher
University College, Galway
Abstract
Is sex work (specifically, prostitution) vulnerable to technological unemployment? Several authors have argued that it is. They claim that the advent of sophisticated sexual robots will lead to the displacement of human prostitutes, just as, say, the advent of sophisticated manufacturing robots have displaced many traditional forms of factory labour. But are they right? In this article, I critically assess the argument that has been made in favour of this displacement hypothesis. Although I grant the argument a degree of credibility, I argue that the opposing hypothesis -- that prostitution will be resilient to technological unemployment -- is also worth considering. Indeed, I argue that increasing levels of technological unemployment in other fields may well drive more people into the sex work industry. Furthermore, I argue that no matter which hypothesis you prefer -- displacement or resilience -- you can make a good argument for the necessity of a basic income guarantee, either as an obvious way to correct for the precarity of sex work, or as a way to disincentivise those who may be drawn to prostitution.
Keywords Sex Work  Technological Unemployment  Basic Income Guarantee  Philosophy of Sex  Futurism  Ethics of sex  Robot Sex  Artificial Intelligence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

It Doesn't Work.J. Bradford de Long - 1998 - Critical Review 12 (1-2):59-69.
A Republican Right to Basic Income?Philip Pettit - 2007 - Basic Income Studies 2 (2).
The Problem of Unemployment.Dimitria Electra Gatzia - 2012 - Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 7 (2):36-54.
Participation Versus Social Exclusion.Gianluca Grimalda - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3):269 - 279.
A Lockean Argument for Basic Income.Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-04

Total downloads
1,070 ( #1,238 of 2,274,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
162 ( #1,607 of 2,274,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature