Philosophy and Technology 35 (2):1-26 (2022)

Authors
John Danaher
University College, Galway
Abstract
There is a concern that the widespread deployment of autonomous machines will open up a number of ‘responsibility gaps’ throughout society. Various articulations of such techno-responsibility gaps have been proposed over the years, along with several potential solutions. Most of these solutions focus on ‘plugging’ or ‘dissolving’ the gaps. This paper offers an alternative perspective. It argues that techno-responsibility gaps are, sometimes, to be welcomed and that one of the advantages of autonomous machines is that they enable us to embrace certain kinds of responsibility gap. The argument is based on the idea that human morality is often tragic. We frequently confront situations in which competing moral considerations pull in different directions and it is impossible to perfectly balance these considerations. This heightens the burden of responsibility associated with our choices. We cope with the tragedy of moral choice in different ways. Sometimes we delude ourselves into thinking the choices we make were not tragic ; sometimes we delegate the tragic choice to others ; sometimes we make the choice ourselves and bear the psychological consequences. Each of these strategies has its benefits and costs. One potential advantage of autonomous machines is that they enable a reduced cost form of delegation. However, we only gain the advantage of this reduced cost if we accept that some techno-responsibility gaps are virtuous.
Keywords responsibility   tragic choices   moral dilemmas   delegation   illusions   burden ofchoice   responsibility gap   AI   robotics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-022-00519-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 74 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tragic Choices in Humanitarian Health Work.Matthew Hunt, Christina Sinding & Lisa Schwartz - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (4):333-344.
Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.Katinka Waelbers - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
Sentimentalism and Moral Dilemmas.András Szigeti - 2015 - Dialectica 69 (1):1-22.
Group Responsibility.Christian List - forthcoming - In Dana Nelkin & Derk Pereboom (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collective Responsibility Gaps.Stephanie Collins - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4):943-954.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-11

Total views
225 ( #50,021 of 2,506,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
225 ( #2,341 of 2,506,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes