The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art

Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mr. Danto argues that recent developments in the artworld, in particular the production of works of art that cannot be told from ordinary things, make urgent the need for a new theory of art and make plain the factors such a theory can and cannot involve. In the course of constructing such a theory, he seeks to demonstrate the relationship between philosophy and art, as well as the connections that hold between art and social institutions and art history. The book distinguishes what belongs to artistic theory from what has traditionally been confused with it, namely aesthetic theory and offers as well a systematic account of metaphor, expression, and style, together with an original account 0f artistic representation. A wealth of examples, drawn especially from recent and contemporary art, illuminate the argument.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#193,691)

6 months
14 (#216,207)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Narrative testimony.Rachel Fraser - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):4025-4052.
Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art?Elzė Sigutė Mikalonytė & Markus Kneer - 2022 - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interactions.
The concept of the aesthetic.James Shelley - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Personal Style and Artistic Style.Nick Riggle - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261):711-731.

View all 99 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references