American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):19-21 (2013)
This is a response to Earp and colleagues' target article "If I could just stop loving you: Anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical break-up". I argue that the authors may indulge in the vice of in-principlism when presenting their ethical framework for dealing with anti-love biotechnology, and that they mis-apply the concept of harm.
|Keywords||Enhancement Biotechnology Anti-Love Harm Principle|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
If I Could Just Stop Loving You: Anti-Love Biotechnology and the Ethics of a Chemical Breakup.Brian D. Earp, Olga A. Wudarczyk, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):3-17.
Citations of this work BETA
Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility.John Danaher - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (2):359-378.
Similar books and articles
Is It Better to Love Better Things?Aaron Smuts - 2015 - In Tony Milligan, Christian Maurer & Kamila Pacovská (eds.), Love and Its Objects.
Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love.Sharon Krishek - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Love, That Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect.Marguerite La Caze - 2005 - Hypatia 20 (3):92-114.
Love as the Basic Moral Principle in Paul Ramsey's Ethics.Charles E. Harris Jr - 1976 - Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):239 - 258.
Added to index2013-10-17
Total downloads198 ( #20,721 of 2,158,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #29,914 of 2,158,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?