Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):225-237 (1999)
If the mental is subject to indeterminacy, does this rule out the possibility of psychophysical laws? One might think so. However, Jaegwon Kim has argued for the existence of a kind of psychophysical law that is not obviously susceptible to problems posed by indeterminacy. I begin by introducing a weak and relatively uncontroversial indeterminacy thesis. Then, by appealing to constraints on theories of strong supervenience and to general considerations about the nature of indeterminacy, I argue that even Kim’s laws cannot accommodate indeterminacy. The result is an argument against the possibility of Kim‐Style psychophysical laws
|Keywords||Epistemology Laws Mental Physical Kim, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
How Not to Refute Quine: Evaluating Kim's Alternatives to Naturalized Epistemology.Benjamin Bayer - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):473-495.
Similar books and articles
Psychophysical Supervenience and Nonreductive Materialism.Ausonio Marras - 1993 - Synthese 95 (2):275-304.
Multiple Realizability and Psychological Laws: Evaluating Kim's Challenge.D. Gene Witmer - 2003 - In Sven Walter & Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation. Imprint Academic. pp. 59.
Psychophysical Laws.Jaegwon Kim - 1985 - In Brian P. Mclaughlin & Ernest Lepore (eds.), Action and Events. Blackwell.
Phenomenal Properties, Psychophysical Laws and the Identity Theory.Jaegwon Kim - 1972 - The Monist 56 (April):178-92.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #120,862 of 2,146,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,123 of 2,146,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.