Non-reflexive Nonsense: Proof-Theory for Paracomplete Weak Kleene Logic

Studia Logica:1-17 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim is to provide a sequent calculus whose external consequence relation coincides with the three-valued paracomplete logic `of nonsense' introduced by Dmitry Bochvar and, independently, presented as the weak Kleene logic K3W by Stephen C. Kleene. The main features of this calculus are (i) that it is non-reflexive, i.e., Identity is not included as an explicit rule (although a restricted form of it with premises is derivable); (ii) that it includes rules where no variable-inclusion conditions are attached; and (iii) that it is hybrid, insofar as it includes both left and right operational introduction as well as elimination rules.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-27

Downloads
378 (#63,147)

6 months
212 (#17,462)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bruno Da Re
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
Damian Szmuc
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Tolerant, Classical, Strict.Pablo Cobreros, Paul Egré, David Ripley & Robert van Rooij - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):347-385.
Semantical analysis of weak Kleene logics.Roberto Ciuni & Massimiliano Carrara - 2019 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 29 (1):1-36.
Metainferential duality.Bruno Da Ré, Federico Pailos, Damian Szmuc & Paula Teijeiro - 2020 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 30 (4):312-334.
Derivability and Metainferential Validity.Bruno Da Ré, Damian Szmuc & Paula Teijeiro - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (6):1521-1547.

View all 12 references / Add more references