Reply to Griffin, Raz, and wolf

Utilitas 18 (4):434-444 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I am honored that Jim Griffin, Joseph Raz, and Susan Wolf, all of whose work I greatly admire, have thought my ideas on welfare and care worth engaging, and I am very grateful to them for doing so. Each has raised searching and difficult questions. Rather than attempting to respond to them seriatim, I propose to discuss the issues under three broad headings: questions about the concept of welfare, questions about care or sympathetic concern, and the question of whether welfare claims have agent-relative or agent-neutral normative force. These issues are, of course, interconnected, but it may nonetheless be helpful to divide them up in these ways

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mixing Values.Joseph Raz & James Griffin - 1991 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 65 (1):83 - 118.
Respecting value.Mark Eli Kalderon - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):341-365.
Raz on the Right to Autonomy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):96-109.
Authority, Accountability, and Preemption.Stephen Darwall - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (1):103-119.
Reply to Kurt Baier.James Griffin - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):130-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#141,404)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Darwall
Yale University

Citations of this work

Resisting buck-passing accounts of prudential value.Guy Fletcher - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):77-91.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references