Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):99-109 (2014)

Authors
Abstract
Besides the usual business of solving paradoxes, there has been recent philosophical work on their essential nature. Lycan characterises a paradox as “an inconsistent set of propositions, each of which is very plausible.” Building on this definition, Paseau offers a numerical measure of paradoxicality of a set of principles: a function of the degrees to which a subject believes the principles considered individually (all typically high) and of the degree to which the subject believes the principles considered together (typically low). We argue (a) that Paseau's measure fails to score certain paradoxes properly and (b) that this failure is not due to the particular measure but rather that any such function just of credences fails to adequately capture paradoxicality. Our analysis leads us to conclude that Lycan's definition also fails to capture the notion of paradox
Keywords credence  paradox  measure
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/tht3.117
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays.Willard van Orman Quine - 1966 - New York, NY, USA: Harvard University Press.
Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief.Henry Ely Kyburg - 1961 - Middletown, CT, USA: Middletown, Conn., Wesleyan University Press.
Putnam’s Paradox.David Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.
What, Exactly, is a Paradox?W. G. Lycan - 2010 - Analysis 70 (4):615-622.
An Exact Measure of Paradox.A. C. Paseau - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):17-26.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An Exact Measure of Paradox.A. C. Paseau - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):17-26.
Zeno's Metrical Paradox Revisited.David M. Sherry - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):58-73.
Paradoxes About Belief.Jesper Kallestrup - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):107-117.
The Paradox of Knowability and Factivity.Michael Shaffer - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philiosophy 8 (1):85-91.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
Mind and Paradox.Paul Saka - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):377-87.
Belief, Credence, and Norms.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):1-27.
The Liar Paradox in New Clothes.Jeff Snapper - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):319-322.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-08

Total views
121 ( #89,639 of 2,455,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes