Epistemology, controversies, and pragmatics
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
In this paper, I wish to present and defend the thesis that the impasse at which the philosophy and history of science find themselves in the last couple of decades is due, to a large extent, either to the complete neglect or to a misguided treatment of t he role of scientific controversies in the evolution of science.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Do Disputes Over Priority Tell Us Anything About Science?Alan G. Gross - 1998 - Science in Context 11 (2):161-179.
Review of Eemeren & Garssen (2008): Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Inês Signorini - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):181-187.
Similar books and articles
Review of 'Controversies and the Metaphysics of Mind' by Yaron Senderowicz. [REVIEW]Richard Brown - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
Controversies in the Scientific Revolution.Victor Boantza Marcelo Dascal (ed.) - forthcoming - John Benjamins.
Controversies and Existence Claims in Chemistry: The Theory of Resonance.Hans P. W. Vermeeren - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):273-290.
Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):467.
Controversies and Epistemology.Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:159-192.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
35 ( #292,482 of 2,410,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,320 of 2,410,442 )
2009-01-28
Total views
35 ( #292,482 of 2,410,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,320 of 2,410,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
