Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):147-156 (2013)

Steven Daskal
Northern Illinois University
This article discusses moral issues raised by defined contribution retirement plans, specifically 401(k) plans in the United States. The primary aim is to defend the claim that the federal government ought to require 401(k) plans to include a range of socially responsible investment (SRI) options. The analysis begins with the minimal assumption that corporations engage in behavior that imposes morally impermissible harms on others with sufficient regularity to warrant attention. After motivating this assumption, I argue that individual investors typically share in the responsibility for the harms imposed by corporations in which they invest, and that they therefore have a moral obligation to incorporate considerations of social responsibility into their investment decisions, when possible, to avoid being complicit in morally impermissible corporate behavior. I further argue that individuals are subject to substantial institutional and structural pressures that create a powerful incentive to invest in 401(k) plans, even though such plans typically lack any SRI options. To eliminate this pressure to commit indirect harm in the process of saving for retirement, I recommend that the federal government requires 401(k) plans to incorporate a range of SRI options, and I defend this proposal from several possible objections
Keywords Socially responsible investment  Retirement savings  Mutual funds  Ethical investing  Defined contribution
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1288-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sweatshops and Respect for Persons.Denis G. Arnold & Norman E. Bowie - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):221-242.
Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility.Manuel Velasquez - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):531-562.
Socially Responsible Investing in the United States.Steve Schueth - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):189 - 194.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Research and Ethical Issues Related to Retirement Plans.H. Fred Mittelstaedt - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):153-159.
Capitalism, Coordination, and Keynes: Rejoinder to Horwitz.Greg Hill - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (3):373-387.
Socially Responsible Investment: Differences Between Europe and the United States.Céline Louche & Steven Lydenberg - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:112-117.
Beyond Good Intentions: New Directions for Investing in Sustainability.Jacob Park - 2005 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:101-108.


Added to PP index

Total views
173 ( #63,481 of 2,462,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,988 of 2,462,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes