The Study of Controversies and the Theory and History of Science

Science in Context 11 (2):147-154 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

These introductory remarks are unorthodox in many respects. The deviance from usual practice is justified by the extreme importance I attach to the subject matter of this special issue. I want to convey to the reader a sense of why I think controversies, particularly in science, are so crucial, and to propose a different way of thinking about them. This mandates, in the limited space available, a compact presentation, omitting supporting arguments and necessary elaboration — for which the reader is referred to the bibliography.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Controversies and Epistemology.Marcelo Dascal - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:159-192.
The Role of History in Science.Richard Creath - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):207 - 214.
Entangled History and the Scholarly Concept of Enlightenment.Jeffrey D. Burson - 2013 - Contributions to the History of Concepts 8 (2):1-24.
Science and anti-science.Gerald James Holton - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
46 (#338,714)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marcelo Dascal
Last affiliation: Tel Aviv University