Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):139-160 (2013)

Abstract
This article addresses prospective and retrospective responsibility issues connected with medical robotics. It will be suggested that extant conceptual and legal frameworks are sufficient to address and properly settle most retrospective responsibility problems arising in connection with injuries caused by robot behaviours (which will be exemplified here by reference to harms occurred in surgical interventions supported by the Da Vinci robot, reported in the scientific literature and in the press). In addition, it will be pointed out that many prospective responsibility issues connected with medical robotics are nothing but well-known robotics engineering problems in disguise, which are routinely addressed by roboticists as part of their research and development activities: for this reason they do not raise particularly novel ethical issues. In contrast with this, it will be pointed out that novel and challenging prospective responsibility issues may emerge in connection with harmful events caused by normal robot behaviours. This point will be illustrated here in connection with the rehabilitation robot Lokomat
Keywords Responsibility in medical robotics  Robo-ethics  Ethical issues concerning rehabilitation robotics  Liability in robotic-assisted surgery  Philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9301-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,110
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Responsibility.Andrew Eshleman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Theories of Tort Law.Jules L. Coleman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mind the Gap: Responsible Robotics and the Problem of Responsibility.David J. Gunkel - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (4):307-320.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Robotrust and Legal Responsibility.Ugo Pagallo - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):367-379.
How Hiring: Dogs and Humans Need Not Apply. [REVIEW]Richard G. Epstein - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):227-236.
Institutional Robotics.Porfirio Silva & Pedro U. Lima - 2007 - In F. Almeida e Costa et al (ed.), Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Springer Verlag.
There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
Relationalism Through Social Robotics.Raya A. Jones - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):405-424.
Responsibility for the Future.Joel Feinberg - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:93-113.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-29

Total views
95 ( #112,949 of 2,448,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #227,143 of 2,448,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes