Authors
John J. Davenport
Fordham University
Abstract
This essay argues that Mark C. Murphy's original contribution to natural law ethics succeeds in finding a way between older metaphysical and newer purely practical approaches in this genre. Murphy's reconstruction of the function argument, critique of subjectivist theories of well-being, and rigorous formulation of a flexible welfarist theory of value deserve careful attention. I defend Kant against Murphy's critique and argue that Murphy faces the problem of showing that all his basic goods are morally inviolable. Although I endorse Murphy's critique of radical virtue ethics, I raise objections to the basic moral norms he derives from his list of goods, and to the analysis of peace of mind and happiness as basic goods
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0019-0365
DOI 10.5840/ipq20034327
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,803
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Natural Law and Practical Rationality.Daniel McInerny - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (1):165-167.
A Natural Law Based Environmental Ethic.Scott A. Davison - 2009 - Ethics and the Environment 14 (1):pp. 1-13.
Reason in Action.John Finnis - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Introduction: Aspects of Rationality.Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling - 2004 - In Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford University Press.
Existentialism and Natural Law.Jonathan Crowe - 2005 - Adelaide Law Review 26:55-72.
Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex.S. J. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):433-449.
Introduction.Chappell Timothy & S. Oderberg David - 2004 - Cités 19:123-124.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
26 ( #396,519 of 2,401,578 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,578 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes