Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):134–144 (2008)
I argue here that certain species of war, namely humanitarian military interventions (HMIs), can be obligatory within particular contexts. Specifically, I look at the notion of HMIs through the lens of just war theory and argue that when a minimal account of jus ad bellum implies that an intervention is permissible, it also implies that it is obligatory. I begin by clarifying the jus ad bellum conditions (such as just cause, right intentions, etc.) under which an intervention is permissible. I then turn to the claim that permissibility necessitates obligation, by first showing that whenever an intervention is permissible, it is also minimally decent. Second, I show that minimally decent actions are morally obligatory by arguing that the notion of minimal decency is a conceptual bridge between negative and positive duties. Third, I argue that performing minimally decent actions is necessary for a state to be just. Ultimately, my conclusion arises from the following observation: if a humanitarian crisis is bad enough for one to hold that it is permissible to breach sovereignty of a nation, then it is bad enough to hold that there is an obligation to intervene.
|Keywords||humanitarian interventions war|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Is There a Duty to Intervene? Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect.James Pattison - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (6):570-579.
Deliberating About Justice: The Role of Justice in the Practical Deliberations of States.Joshua J. Kassner - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (2):210-231.
Similar books and articles
Justifying Coercive and Non-Coercive Intervention: Strategic and Humanitarian Arguments.Rory J. Conces - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):133-52.
Just Military Preparedness, U.S. Military Hegemony, and Contingency Planning for Intervention in Sudan.Harry van der Linden - 2010 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):135-152.
Motives, Outcomes, Intent and the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention.Alex J. Bellamy - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3):216-232.
Humanitarian Intervention, Altruism, and the Limits of Casuistry.Richard B. Miller - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):3 - 35.
Forgotten Victims of Military Humanitarian Intervention: A Case for the Principle of Reparation?Shunzo Majima - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):203-209.
Humanitarian Intervention, Consent, and Proportionality.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In N. Ann Davis, Richard Keshen & Jeff McMahan (eds.), Ethics and Humanity: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Glover. Oxford University Press.
Humanitarian Intervention: Loose Ends.Fernando R. Tesón - 2011 - Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):192-212.
The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes.Deane-Peter Baker & James Pattison - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #55,928 of 2,154,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,428 of 2,154,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?