Boycotts, Expressive Acts, and Withdrawal of Support

Business Ethics Journal Review 8 (3):14-19 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Alan Tomhave and Mark Vopat have argued that organized boycotts against the expressive acts of companies and their leaders are pro tanto morally wrong because they constitute an attempt to silence voices in the marketplace of ideas. I argue that such boycotts are not best viewed as attempts to silence, but rather as a morally permissible form of withdrawal of support of certain expressive acts.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Expressive Speech Acts in Educational e-chats.Carmen Maíz-Arévalo - 2017 - Pragmática Sociocultural 5 (2):151-178.
Expressive Causality and the Ontological Integrity of Nature.Edward M. Engelmann - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):461-482.
Boycott Basics: Moral Guidelines for Corporate Decision Making.Mary Lyn Stoll - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 84 (S1):3 - 10.
Strong Reciprocity in Consumer Boycotts.Tobias Hahn & Noël Albert - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 145 (3):509-524.
Consumer Boycotts as Instruments for Structural Change.Valentin Beck - 2018 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (4):543-559.
Duty and Boycotts: A Kantian Analysis.Richard Robinson - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 149 (1):117-126.
Medium, subject matter and representation.John Dilworth - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):45-62.


Added to PP

36 (#445,143)

6 months
11 (#241,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Davis
University of Georgia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Silencing speech.Ishani Maitra - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):pp. 309-338.

Add more references