Authors |
|
Abstract |
Kieran Oberman argues that there is no such thing, in realistic circumstances, as an optional war, i.e. a war that it is permissible for a state to wage, but not obligatory. Regarding a central kind of war – humanitarian intervention – this is due to what Oberman calls the Cost Principle, which says that states may not impose humanitarian costs on their citizens that those citizens do not have independent humanitarian obligations to meet. Essentially, this means that if the seriousness of a humanitarian crisis is sufficient to justify imposing a certain level of cost, it must be serious enough to ground a genuine obligation to intervene.
This paper offers three cases where, even if we accept the Cost Principle, war may be reasonably described as optional. These include the state’s moral relationship to amassing support for voluntary contributions to a war that would otherwise exceed the threshold established by Cost Principle (the Voluntary War); a war where it is uncertain whether costs will exceed the threshold (the Forever War); and two wars whose costs would individually fall below the threshold, but which would collectively fall above it.
While none of these examples is conclusive, I conclude that Oberman must defend some further, contestable moral claims to establish that the optional humanitarian war is a myth. The Cost Principle alone does not get us there.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Myth of the Optional War: Why States Are Required to Wage the Wars They Are Permitted to Wage.Kieran Oberman - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (4):255-286.
Is There a Duty to Militarily Intervene to Stop a Genocide?Uwe Steinhoff - forthcoming - In Christian Neuhäuser & Christoph Schuck (eds.), Military Interventions: Considerations from Philosophy and Political Science.
Humanitarian Intervention and the Modern State System.Patrick Emerton & Toby Handfield - 2015 - The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and War.
Rebellion, Humanitarian Intervention, and the Prudential Constraints on War.Ned Dobos - 2008 - Journal of Military Ethics 7 (2):102-115.
Against Small Interventions On Sliding Scale Grounds.Jordy Rocheleau - 2012 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):26-38.
The “Discourse” of International Law and Humanitarian Intervention.Gustavo Gozzi - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (2):186-204.
Is Supererogation More Than Just Costly Sacrifice?Elizabeth Drummond Young - 2015 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 77:125-140.
When Does ‘Can’ Imply ‘Ought’?Stephanie Collins - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (3):354-375.
Intrafamilial Organ Donation Is Often an Altruistic Act.Aaron Spital - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (1):116-118.
When Does Might Make Right? Using Force for Regime Change.John Linarelli - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (3):343-362.
The United Nations and Humanitarian Intervention.Sir Adam Roberts - 2003 - In Jennifer M. Welsh (ed.), Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations. Oxford University Press.
A Utilitarian Approach for the Governance of Humanitarian Migration.Herbert Brücker - 2018 - Analyse & Kritik 40 (2):293-320.
Libertarianism and Collective Action: Is There a Libertarian Case for Mandatory Vaccination?Charlie T. Blunden - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):71-74.
The Limitations of the Use of Hard Power for Humanitarian Intervention by the UK in a 2025 Timeframe.Thomas Piran Hughes - unknown
Humanitarian Intervention: Moral and Philosophical Issues.Aleksandar Jokic (ed.) - 2003 - Broadview Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-08-12
Total views
37 ( #307,351 of 2,508,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,100 of 2,508,064 )
2020-08-12
Total views
37 ( #307,351 of 2,508,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,100 of 2,508,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads