Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):183-194 (1990)
I criticise the ‘liberal’view of the proper relationship between the family and State, namely that, although the interests of the child should be paramount, parents are entitled to rights of both privacy and autonomy which should be abrogated only when the child suffers a specifiable harm. I argue that the right to bear children is not absolute, and that it only grounds a right to rear upon an objectionable proprietarian picture of the child as owned by its producer. If natural parents have any rights to rear they derive from duties to bring their children into rational maturity where they can exercise rights for themselves. The presumption that natural parents are best suited to rear their own children should be discounted, as should the assumption that alternatives to natural parenting are unacceptably bad. I reject the suggestion that parents should be ‘licensed’but argue for a much closer monitoring of the family. Familial privacy, which such monitoring breaches, is shown to have a culturally specific and, given the facts of abuse, dubious value. In conclusion, I briefly specify the forms of monitoring I approve.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Reprint years||1996, 1999|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Licensing Parents to Protect Our Children?Jurgen De Wispelaere & Daniel Weinstock - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):195-205.
Reproductive Cloning and a (Kind of) Genetic Fallacy.Neil Levy & Mianna Lotz - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):232-250.
Reproductive Cloning and a (Kind of) Genetic Fallacy.Dr Neil Levy & Dr Mianna Lotz - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):232–250.
Rights, Moral Values and Natural Facts: A Reply to Mary Midgley on the Problem of Child-Abuse.David Archard - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):99-104.
Similar books and articles
Using Bioethics Discourse to Determine When Parents Should Make Health Care Decisions for Their Children: Is Deference Justified?Jennifer L. Rosato - manuscript
Schoeman's Alternative to the Liberal View of the Family.Richard O'Neil - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:217-224.
The Terror of Explicitness: Philosophical Remarks on the Idea of a Parenting Contract.Stefan Ramaekers & Bert Lambeir - 2007 - Ethics and Education 2 (2):95-107.
Fundamental Interests and Parental Rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.
Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making.Ferdinand Schoeman - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads91 ( #53,993 of 2,146,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,029 of 2,146,978 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.