Hypatia 21 (4):58-76 (2001)

Authors
Victoria Davion
University of Georgia
Abstract
: In this essay, Davion argues that many arguments appealing to an "intuition" that reproductive cloning is morally wrong because it is "unnatural" rely upon an underlying moral assumption that only heterosexuality is "natural," an assumption that grounds extreme homophobia in America. Therefore, critics of cloning who are in favor of gay and lesbian equality have reasons to avoid prescriptive appeals to the so-called "natural" in making their arguments. Davion then suggests anticloning arguments that do not make such appeals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.2979/HYP.2006.21.4.58
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,700
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ecological Feminism.Karen J. Warren (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
43 ( #241,077 of 2,432,331 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #466,190 of 2,432,331 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes