Synthese 191 (13):3009-3026 (2014)

Authors
Kevin Davey
University of Chicago
Abstract
Some philosophers have recently argued that contrary to the traditional view, good scientific theories can in fact be logically inconsistent. The literature is now full of case-studies that are taken to support this claim. I will argue however that as of yet no-one has managed to articulate a philosophically interesting view about the role of logically inconsistent theories in science that genuinely goes against tradition, is plausibly true, and is supported by any of the case studies usually given
Keywords Inconsistency  Scientific theories  Philosophy of science  Justification
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0470-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - London, England: Routledge.
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Studying Controversies: Unification, Contradiction, Integration.Stefan Petkov - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (1):103-128.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ontological Commitments of Inconsistent Theories.Mark Colyvan - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):115 - 123.
Inconsistent Theories as Scientific Objectives.Dilip B. Madan - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):453-470.
Inconsistency and Scientific Reasoning.Joel M. Smith - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (4):429-445.
Understanding Inconsistent Science.Peter Vickers - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Feyerabend and the Pragmatic Theory of Observation.Robert E. Butts - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (4):383-394.
Scientific Reasoning or Damage Control: Alternative Proposals for Reasoning with Inconsistent Representations of the World.Joel M. Smith - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:241 - 248.
The Virtues of Inconsistency.Peter Klein - 1985 - The Monist 68 (1):105-135.
Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics.Mathias Frisch - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (4):525-549.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Is Science Inconsistent?Otávio Bueno & Peter Vickers - 2014 - Synthese 191 (13):2887-2889.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-22

Total views
75 ( #152,449 of 2,499,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,750 of 2,499,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes