Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):170-172 (1999)
Abstract |
This article is a thoughtful and well written examination of some of the complex issues that have emerged as a result of recent improvements in the treatment of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, including those who weigh 500 to 600 grams or who are believed to be 23 to 24 weeks gestation. The authors argue that the 23 to 24 week gestation period is filled with ambiguity and flexibility in practice relative to active resuscitation. However, such ambiguity and flexibility is likely to prevail whatever the boundary conditions of viability happen to be. Thus moral guidelines that inform the rescue of an infant believed to be 500 to 600 grams or 23 or 24 weeks gestation are likely to be relevant whatever the boundary conditions are
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s0963180199222050 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Response to “Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology” by Jonathan Muraskas Et Al. And “Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel” by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig. [REVIEW]Thomas J. Simpson - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):524-526.
Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology.Jonathan Muraskas, Patricia A. Marshall, Paul Tomich, Thomas F. Myers, John G. Gianopoulos & David C. Thomasma - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):160-170.
Response to “Giving 'Moral Distress' a Voice: Ethical Concerns Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel” by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig and “Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology” by Jonathan Muraskas Et Al. [REVIEW]Anita J. Catlin & Brian S. Carter - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (3):400-403.
Parental Refusal to Terminate Pregnancy in Face of a Strongly Negative Prognosis of Neonatal Viability.Caroline Guibet Lafaye - 2009 - Ethical Perspectives 16 (4):485-508.
Commentary on Democratic “Deliberation, Public Reason, and Environmental Politics”.Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Environmental Philosophy 3 (2):59-63.
A Dutch Report on the Ethics of Neonatal Care: A Commentary.R. Rivers - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):17-18.
Report of an International Conference on the Medical and Ethical Management of the Neonate at the Edge of Viability: A Review of Approaches From Five Countries. [REVIEW]William R. Sexson, Deborah K. Cruze, Marilyn B. Escobedo & Alfred W. Brann - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (1):31-42.
Commentary on "Confronting Misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has Not Been Accomplished?".Paul J. Friedman - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):177-178.
Do Neonates Display Innate Self-Awareness? Why Neonatal Imitation Fails to Provide Sufficient Grounds for Innate Self-and Other-Awareness.Talia Welsh - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):221-238.
Issues of Development: Towards a New Role for Science and Technology: [Proceedings of an International Symposium on Science and Technology for Development, Held in Singapore in January 1979].Maurice Goldsmith & Alexander King (eds.) - 1979 - Pergamon Press.
Ancient Technology. Finnish Institute at Athens Symposium Held 30.3–4.4.1987. (Teknüikan Museon Julkaisuja, 5.) Pp. 87; 45 Drawings, 8 Photographs, 9 Maps. Helsinki: The Museum of Technology, 1990. Paper. [REVIEW]P. H. Blyth - 1992 - The Classical Review 42 (01):234-.
Commentary: Weighing the Balance.Amnon Goldworth - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):415-416.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-24
Total views
53 ( #216,169 of 2,520,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,900 )
2010-08-24
Total views
53 ( #216,169 of 2,520,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,900 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads