International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):89 - 101 (2007)
Examples involving infinite suspended chains or infinite trains are sometimes used to defend perceived weaknesses in traditional cosmological arguments. In this article, we distinguish two versions of the cosmological argument, suggest that such examples can only be relevant if it is one specific type of cosmological argument that is being considered, and then criticize the use of such examples in this particular type of cosmological argument. Our criticism revolves around a discussion of what it means to call a system closed, and what it means to call an explanation complete. Our analysis makes no suppositions about the nature of the infinite, and is therefore independent of many of the issues around which contemporary discussions of the cosmological argument have tended to revolve.
|Keywords||Cosmological argument Explanation Closed systems Causation First cause Efficient cause Causation in esse|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Kalam Cosmological Argument.William Lane Craig - 1979 - In Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie. Rutgers University Press. pp. 383-383.
Concerning Infinite Chains, Infinite Trains, and Borrowing a Typewriter.David A. Conway - 1983 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (2):71 - 86.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Van Inwagen on the Cosmological Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (1):31-40.
Defeasible Reasoning, Special Pleading and the Cosmological Argument.Robert C. Koons - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):192-203.
The Design Argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads80 ( #64,913 of 2,163,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,191 of 2,163,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?